2003, April 26
|
2003, April 26
|
|
|
Red Bank Oaks Agenda
26 April 2003
1) Call to Order
Board Members present: Landowners present:
2) Approval of Agenda (Add-Ins or Deletions)
3) Discuss Amendment to Meeting Minutes from 19 October 2002 Meeting
Two minor typos were detected in the 19 October 2002 published meeting minutes. The typos and proposed corrections are as follows:
The first item noted in the topic of Funding
Restrictions:
The second item noted in the topic of Election of
Officers: Since there were not enough parcels (35) represented at this meeting,
a final vote
4) Approve/Disapprove Amendment to Meeting Minutes from 19 October 2002 Meeting
5) Treasurer’s Report on Discretionary Funds Available for Remainder of 2002-2003 Term
Of the $4,500 discretionary funds available from the 2002-2003 term cattle-grazing revenue:
How much has been expended thus far? How much is needed to cover expenses for the remainder of the 2002-2003 term? What excess/deficit is projected?
6) Road Maintenance
7) Develop Proposals for Relieving Funding Restrictions
There continues to be insufficient funds available to cover essential Red Bank Oaks expenses. Landowners must decide this issue. At the 19 October 2002 meeting, landowners requested the Board of Directors put forth proposals for resolving the funding issues. Landowners elected to have the implementation of a solution voted on at the April meeting (reference 19 October 2002 meeting minutes).
8) Select and Approve Proposals for Relieving Funding Restrictions to be put forth to the Landowners
Which of the proposals developed in action item #7 (above) will be put forth to the landowners for consideration?
9) Discuss Mr. and Mrs. LANDOWNER'S Input Regarding Compensation for Red Bank Oaks Perimeter Fencing
The Board of Directors received e-mail correspondence from Mrs. and Mr. LANDOWNER on 26 October 2002. Following is an excerpt from that correspondence:
“…When we purchased the property many years ago there was nothing about having to have a fence… Years after we purchased the property it was decided to let cattle graze, but there was still no mention of having to have a fence. The ranchers were supposed to watch their cows… If a fence needs to be installed permission must first be granted and then some sort of compensation should be given as it decreases the value of the land. Many of the other owners in Red Banks do not have a fence across their property, the burden of a fence is being born by only owners of the property along the boarders…”
Of the 69 parcels in Red Bank Oaks, 36 parcels (over half) border the perimeter. Of those 36 parcels, at least 29 are confirmed to be fenced along the outer border (along the perimeter of Red Bank Oaks) to keep cattle from Red Bank Oaks and neighboring ranches separated and contained on the individual ranches. It is unclear to what degree, if any, each of the remaining 7 properties are fenced.
In response to Mr. and Mrs. LANDOWNER, the Board of Directors promised to further investigate the responsibilities and liabilities associated with perimeter fencing.
10) [Add-In Items]
11) Adjourn
|
|
Copyright © 2008
Red Bank Oaks Property Owners' Association
|
